Kant Essay -- essays research papers

Isaac Newton had a new approach to the experienceence of spot and while that contradicted that of great philosophers such as Leibniz and Descates. Newton felt that blank and time are infinite and independent of the body and mind, that the bodies and minds of the world come throughed in property and time and even without the presence of physical bodies there tranquillize would be aloofness and time. He stated there are positions in space and time which are independent of the material entities that existed in them and that the principles of overturn space and time are possible. In the Prolegomena, Immanuel Kant seems to have agreed in part with Newtons views of space and time and attempted to incite Newton by presenting two forms of mind that would maintain Newtons thesis, these being judgments of perceptual experience and judgments of experience. Kant first described the ability of a judgment of perception to become a judgment of experience. Judgments of perception are ou r deliver purely individual perceptions of an object or feeling and may not be the same experience as that of another persons. He states that judgments of perception are merely unverifi adapted intuitions of an object and have no accusive validity. He believed that judgments of perception require no pure innovation of understanding, tho only the logical connection of perception in a idea subject. Kant feels that for a judgment of perception to become a judgment of experience, the natural observation of the object must be the same for alone subjective perceptions thereby becoming universally true to all people, only whence will the judgment becomes preyly valid and a pure concept and only then do we have an experiance. An example presented in the Prolegomena to cover up the difference between judgments of perception and judgments of experience also helps to understand how a judgment of perception becomes a judgment of experience through the look of causality. The example stated is when the sun shines on a rock, the rock grows warm. This would be a judgment of perception if the tale remained as shown. We cannot say that merely because the sun is shinning it caused the rock to warm. When we change the statement to the sun warms the rock, then this statement presents additional information to the original perception, that of cause. With the addition of causality, the statement becomes objecti... ...niverse does not correct to the laws of geometry. He showed that space-time may be a four-dimensional bending of space and that the fourth dimension is time itself. This new form of physics makes more sense if we assume that space and time are able to exist independent of the mind. Even though Kant was able to base galore(postnominal) of the laws of science in philosophy, he was not able to show that space and time are tools we use to perceive our world and could never exist themselves absent of the mind. Scientific laws must be judgments of experience and universally objective to be considered laws of science because they need to have the ability to give all observers the same experience of a phenomenon. Where Kant is wrong is his belief of space and time as dependent upon the mind. New discoveries in physics have shown that space and time must be able to exist in the absence seizure of the mind, proving that Kant was wrong in his presumption that space and time could never exist absolutely. Science today may have its elementary basis in philosophy, but the higher principles of science, particularly that of physics, are outside the understanding and mentation of philosophy.